Further Findings 10. The reality of how aid is delivered (and reported) makes it difficult and practically unfeasible to produce country or donor rankings. Here’s why. Read More... 09. A note on size In the 2013 ATI, as in previous years, large organisations generally score better than small ones. Does bigger mean better? Read More... 08. AIDs funding in the ATI. It’s a mixed picture in terms of transparency. Read More... 07. EU ATI brief Progress made by EU Member States and EU institutions. Read More... 06. Format matters. IATI XML, Excel, PDF, websites – the format of data published affects donor rankings in the 2013 ATI. Read More... 05. Performance across indicators. How do donors rank across all indicators in this year’s ATI? Read More... 04. Organisation performance by size How does the value of total aid provided by all donors rank in transparency terms? Read More... 03. Performance by type of organisation. How do multilaterals, bilaterals, International Financial Institutions, and EU member states rate in the 2013 ATI? Read More... 02. Performance categories. Very good, good, fair, poor, very poor: how do donors perform? Read More... 01. Overall scores. In-depth analysis of the overall scores in the 2013 ATI. Read More...
