Please note: You are using an outdated version of Internet Explorer. Please update to IE10 here to properly experience the ATI website.

1.

United Nations Development Programme (UNDP)

Very good

1

OVERVIEW

See UN-wide recommendations.

UNDP should be congratulated for making significant improvements to the quality of its publication and for updating its common standard implementation schedule to include plans for publishing 97% of the assessed IATI fields. Most of these fields are already included in UNDP’s current IATI files which are updated on a monthly basis. UNDP’s 2013 Information Disclosure Policy makes disclosure the rule rather than the exception and clarifies the nature of exceptions and the harms tests and public interest overrides these are subject to; its appeals process however is not sufficiently independent. UNDP began publishing to IATI in November 2011. It co-hosts the IATI Secretariat, leading a consortium with UNOPS, Ghana, Sweden and Development Initiatives since 2013. UNDP’s open data platform – open.undp.org – is driven by its IATI data and allows users to access and use detailed information on its projects, including budget information and project documents.

ANALYSIS

UNDP scores 90.6%, making it the top ranking agency in the 2014 Index. This commendable performance is owed to consistent improvement in information published to IATI about its activities since 2013. UNDP achieves high scores on all indicator sub-groups, scoring nearly 100% for organisation planning and financial information, activity classifications and basic information; over 85% for commitment and financial data on individual activities; and over 70% for activity-related documents and performance information (results, conditions and impact appraisals). It is one of the few organisations to publish the budget ID, which aims to help align information on development flows with recipient country budget classifications. Project documents such as contracts, tenders and MoUs have also been included in UNDP’s IATI publication since 2013. Although the coverage of information across activities is good, there are some areas for further improvement. For example, tenders are available for just over 5% of projects, whilst 15% of activities contain links to evaluations and only 30% contain results data. UNDP scores on all 39 indicators.

RECOMMENDATIONS

  • UNDP should include links to project documents and results and conditions data for all projects. It should also work to promote traceability of projects implemented by its partners.
  • It should update its Information Disclosure Policy to reflect best practices on independent appeals processes.
  • UNDP should continue to champion aid transparency within the UN and work with other agencies to provide a full picture of all UN activities and promote the use of IATI data in its programming and coordination processes. It should also promote the access and use of this information by others. 

Close

DONOR PROFILE

First published to IATI:

Nov-11

2013 ATI Score:

83.38%

2013 ATI Rank:

4



Visit ATI 2013...

INDICATOR SCORING

TOTAL

90.64%


COMMITMENT TO
AID TRANSPARENCY:

8.78/10


PUBLICATION
ORGANISATION LEVEL:

25/25


PUBLICATION
ACTIVITY LEVEL:

56.86/65

Commitment

1. FOIA

2. Implementation Schedules

3. Accessibility

Publication Status
Source

http://www.undp.org/content/undp/en/home/operations/transparency/information_disclosurepolicy/

Comments

Publish What You Fund completed an assessment of the quality of disclosure policies based on the overarching approach taken in the Global Right to Information Rating. A new methodology has been used for evaluating disclosure policies in 2014.


Click here to view history

1. FOIA

Stage

Status

Format

Source

Comments

Researcher
http://www.undp.org/content/undp/en/home/operations/transparency/information_disclosurepolicy/
Publish What You Fund completed an assessment of the quality of disclosure policies based on the overarching approach taken in the Expand...Global Right to Information Rating.

Donor Review
http://www.undp.org/content/undp/en/home/operations/transparency/information_disclosurepolicy/
Agree

PWYF Review

Independent Reviewer
Disagree

PWYF Final Assessment
http://www.undp.org/content/undp/en/home/operations/transparency/information_disclosurepolicy/
Publish What You Fund completed an assessment of the quality of disclosure policies based on the overarching approach taken in the Expand...Global Right to Information Rating. A new methodology has been used for evaluating disclosure policies in 2014.

Publication Status
Source

http://tracker.publishwhatyoufund.org/plan/organisations/

Comments

Based on Publish What You Fund's analysis of Common Standard/IATI implementation schedules.


Click here to view history

2. Implementation schedules

Stage

Status

Format

Source

Comments

Researcher
http://tracker.publishwhatyoufund.org/plan/organisations/41114/
Based on total score of 92 received on Publish What You Fund's analysis of implementation schedules.

Donor Review
http://tracker.publishwhatyoufund.org/plan/organisations/41114/
Agree

PWYF Review

Independent Reviewer
Disagree

PWYF Final Assessment
http://tracker.publishwhatyoufund.org/plan/organisations/
Based on Publish What You Fund's analysis of Common Standard/IATI implementation schedules.

Publication Status
Source

https://data.undp.org/

Comments

Total points calculated by adding points received on each of the three criteria below: 1) Allows free bulk export - 33 2) Detailed disaggregated data - 33 3) Open licence - 33


Click here to view history

3. Accessibility

Stage

Status

Format

Source

Comments

Researcher
https://data.undp.org/
Total points calculated by adding points received on each of the three criteria below: 1) Allows free bulk export - 33 Expand...2) Detailed disaggregated data - 33 3) Open licence - 33

Donor Review
https://data.undp.org/
Agree

PWYF Review

Independent Reviewer
Disagree

PWYF Final Assessment
https://data.undp.org/
Total points calculated by adding points received on each of the three criteria below: 1) Allows free bulk export - 33 Expand...2) Detailed disaggregated data - 33 3) Open licence - 33

Planning

Financial

4. Organisation Strategy

5. Annual Report

6. Allocation Policy

7. Procurement Policy

8. Country Strategy

9. Total Budget

10. Disaggregated Budgets

11. Audit

Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 100%


Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 100%


Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 100%


Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 100%


Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 99.35%


Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 100%


Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 100%


Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 100%


Basic

Classifications

Financial

Performance

12. Implementer

13. Unique ID

14. Title

15. Description

16. Planned Dates

17. Actual Dates

18. Current Status

19. Contact Details

20. Collaboration Type

21. Flow Type

22. Aid Type

23. Finance Type

24. Sector

25. Sub-national Location

26. Tied Aid Status

33. Budget

34. Commitments

35. Disbursements And Expenditure

36. Budget Identifier

37. Results

38. Impact Appraisals

39. Conditions

Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 99.34%


Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 100%


Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 99.15%


Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 91.6%


Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 100%


Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 97.8%


Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 100%


Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 100%


Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 100%


Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 100%


Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 100%


Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 100%


Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 100%


Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 93.47%


Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 100%


Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 85.06%


Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 14.29%


Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 59.75%


Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 62.18%


Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 64.3%


Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 6.55%


Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 50%


Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 99.98%


Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 100%


Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 32.8%


Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 30.56%


Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 59.77%


Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 79.87%